Are you calling me a boot licker, or referring to someone else? I am an anarchist/anarcho-capitalist/voluntarist. I am anti-government. If you took that I am pro government from my post, then I either didn’t communicate my point across adequately, you didn’t understand my point, or you don’t understand what government is at its most fundamental level.
Yes, you are a boot licker. No, you are absolutely not an anarchist. Sticking feathers up your ass doesn’t make you a chicken. It takes more than just saying that’s what you are, Javert. You are applying legalist morality as justification. Do you not understand why multiple people keep calling you Javert, Javert?
Ah, but I never said I was a commie. Communists anarchists are nonsensical. An anarchist is to monarchy as an atheist is to theism. It simply means no rulers. I believe the best state to exist in would be one without rulers. Communism is a nonsensical state as the abolition of the state and of money is a nonsense proposition.
You understand first and foremost that you cannot steal that in which you already own, correct? Just like you cannot own that in which is stolen. Are we talking about semantics here, or ideas?
If your argument is that Walmart stole from you and thus, you are entitled to what they’ve stolen back, that would be true, so long as you could prove that this occured.
Can you prove without some kind of ethereal ideological viewpoint that this occurred? I could use mental gymnastics to argue that you’ve stolen from me too, so why don’t you go ahead and Venmo me $10,000?
How does your lack of socio political comprehension equate to me having depression? We already know you’re stupid, you don’t need to keep hammering in those nails with ad hominem nonsense, Javert.
Are you calling me a boot licker, or referring to someone else? I am an anarchist/anarcho-capitalist/voluntarist. I am anti-government. If you took that I am pro government from my post, then I either didn’t communicate my point across adequately, you didn’t understand my point, or you don’t understand what government is at its most fundamental level.
Yes, you are a boot licker. No, you are absolutely not an anarchist. Sticking feathers up your ass doesn’t make you a chicken. It takes more than just saying that’s what you are, Javert. You are applying legalist morality as justification. Do you not understand why multiple people keep calling you Javert, Javert?
Ah, but I never said I was a commie. Communists anarchists are nonsensical. An anarchist is to monarchy as an atheist is to theism. It simply means no rulers. I believe the best state to exist in would be one without rulers. Communism is a nonsensical state as the abolition of the state and of money is a nonsense proposition.
And yet you are arguing that it is never acceptable to steal from a walmart.
Have fun with those feathers, Javert.
You understand first and foremost that you cannot steal that in which you already own, correct? Just like you cannot own that in which is stolen. Are we talking about semantics here, or ideas?
If your argument is that Walmart stole from you and thus, you are entitled to what they’ve stolen back, that would be true, so long as you could prove that this occured.
Can you prove without some kind of ethereal ideological viewpoint that this occurred? I could use mental gymnastics to argue that you’ve stolen from me too, so why don’t you go ahead and Venmo me $10,000?
You really just don’t fucking get it, like, at all.
You’re a capitalist boot licker, plain and simple. Your feathers are showing, Javert.
You have depression, don’t you?
How does your lack of socio political comprehension equate to me having depression? We already know you’re stupid, you don’t need to keep hammering in those nails with ad hominem nonsense, Javert.