And he has openly criticized the genocide, but because he didn’t also do a backflip while doing so apparently he needs to fall so a Republican can take his seat.
This is exactly fucking it. You hear “Gaza genocide real” in the year of 2026 and you immediately start soyfacing because of it. Get a fucking grip.
Has your favourite Dubai landlord made 1 (one) anti-Zionist (not liberal Zionist) statement yet? Or is he too busy collaborating with the main genocidaires while not doing the bare minimum (what you call a “backflip” for fucks sake).
“That’s some nice ‘evidence’ you’ve got there. Unfortunately, the person talking about it doesn’t agree with me politically so that means it’s not real.”
Personally, I think you should probably vote for El-Sayed, because I’m not that person and don’t agree with all of her positions on everything. See, and I know this is a difficult concept to grasp, sometimes, a person is right about something, even if I disagree with them about something else. Kind of like Free Beacon, actually!
I’m just chiming in to point out how utterly ridiculous you’re being by writing off evidence just because the source presenting the evidence is biased.
“Get out of the road! There’s a car coming!”
“Who did you vote for? Who do you say I should vote for?”
“Turn around! Look, you can see it with your own eyes!”
“So, you’re too cowardly to answer my questions.”
“Dude, she’s right, there’s a car right there!”
“You must be her alt then. Who do you say I should vote for?”
And he has openly criticized the genocide, but because he didn’t also do a backflip while doing so apparently he needs to fall so a Republican can take his seat.
This is exactly fucking it. You hear “Gaza genocide real” in the year of 2026 and you immediately start soyfacing because of it. Get a fucking grip.
Has your favourite Dubai landlord made 1 (one) anti-Zionist (not liberal Zionist) statement yet? Or is he too busy collaborating with the main genocidaires while not doing the bare minimum (what you call a “backflip” for fucks sake).
I’m just gonna highlight that and walk away with a W.
Roflmao, you deny THAT? 🤣
Edit: For anybody who’s not a cowardly little removed: https://freebeacon.com/democrats/abdul-el-sayed-discloses-rental-property-in-dubai-and-outstanding-debt-to-luxury-developer-behind-resort-style-community/
“That’s some nice ‘evidence’ you’ve got there. Unfortunately, the person talking about it doesn’t agree with me politically so that means it’s not real.”
It’s electorialism actually. El-Sayed may not be perfect. But look who you’re allying with to criticize him.
Maybe you will answer the question they were obviously too cowardly/ignorant/your alt to answer.
Who should I write in?
Lmao “my alt?”
Personally, I think you should probably vote for El-Sayed, because I’m not that person and don’t agree with all of her positions on everything. See, and I know this is a difficult concept to grasp, sometimes, a person is right about something, even if I disagree with them about something else. Kind of like Free Beacon, actually!
I’m just chiming in to point out how utterly ridiculous you’re being by writing off evidence just because the source presenting the evidence is biased.
“Get out of the road! There’s a car coming!”
“Who did you vote for? Who do you say I should vote for?”
“Turn around! Look, you can see it with your own eyes!”
“So, you’re too cowardly to answer my questions.”
“Dude, she’s right, there’s a car right there!”
“You must be her alt then. Who do you say I should vote for?”
Oh so you’re just criticizing the cantidate you hope wins?
Maybe pull over and let someone else drive.