• Walters, Fern@bookwyr.me
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 days ago

    “laws”, “reparations”, “constitutions”, “justice”.

    which have exact meanings in anarchist theory, where Anark went out of his way to distinguish. Do you assume anarchist society don’t have rules, baseline rules everyone is beholden to, reparative work for wrong doings, and a justice process?

    https://anarchistnews.org/content/you-cant-build-anarchy-building-prisons-against-carceral-imagination

    This is the same essay Anark is referencing🤦‍♀️. Why not cite Bakunin, heck even Kropotkin‽ Why rereference the essay we have already read is being questioned for both legitimacy and reparative & rehabilitative justice?

    • mofongo@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 days ago

      Because anarchy is not the question of reparative and rehabilitative justice, that’s cop talk. Justice is a liberal proposition, if you want to do anarchy, you must think bigger not liberal+.

      If you want to talk justice, constitution, law, etc you can join your local social democracy party. Just stop calling yourself anarchist, stop diluting words.

      • Walters, Fern@bookwyr.me
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        9 days ago

        Ok, I see my mistake: You can’t read, and you don’t comprehend “without hierarchy.”

        Later demagogue🖕

          • Walters, Fern@bookwyr.me
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            9 days ago

            “The forest was shrinking but the trees kept voting for the axe, for the axe was clever and convinced the trees that because his handle was made of wood he was one of them.” —Turkish Proverbs

            • mofongo@discuss.tchncs.de
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              9 days ago

              You do realize that wanting anarchy but supporting secret police and prisons makes you the tree voting for the axe, right?

              • Walters, Fern@bookwyr.me
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                9 days ago

                I am not a Leninist. You observed that correctly! Now explain to !Anarchism@lemmy.dbzer0.com why revolutionaries should ignore their oppressors’ information gathering?

                Disengage me from it. I have gathered enough from you to be aware you don’t know anything about revolutionary action.

                • db0@lemmy.dbzer0.comM
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  7 days ago

                  If you want to disengage, just reply with “Disengage”. The disengage rule is not a way to have the last word in