They did the exact same thing when they swallowed up Paramount. In-office mandate to see if they could torment enough employees to quit, along with voluntary buyouts that were basically the severance amounts but occurring earlier, meaning it would reduce employment costs leading to severance payouts.
So they’re just being transparent that “in office” is a cleaner way of laying people off.
They did the exact same thing when they swallowed up Paramount. In-office mandate to see if they could torment enough employees to quit, along with voluntary buyouts that were basically the severance amounts but occurring earlier, meaning it would reduce employment costs leading to severance payouts.