• JVT038@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 day ago

    I mean, look at it this way: 2/3 of Europeans don’t support populists.

    Furthermore, since most European countries do not have a two-party system, this means that European countries can govern with a 2/3 sane majority, and try to ignore the populists’ 1/3 in the Parliament.

    • Sina@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      Populism, being right wing & authoritarianism are not the same things. I’m of the opinion that sane populism on the left is what we need in Europe, but there are almost no examples. (kind of like what Bernie Sander’s populism is like)

    • Honytawk@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 day ago

      Indeed.

      Plenty of countries also don’t have a winner takes all. As a prevention against extremists.

      Take Belgium for example. The populist party won the highest votes. But even the other right-wing parties didn’t want anything to do with them. So they made a coalition with the left to keep those fuckers out.

      Since even the other right-wing parties knew how dumb, bad and ineffective those populists ideas were. Like who cares there are trans people running around. There are actual problems that need to be solved.