This got removed from politics because “Video links are not allowed” apparently? Pretty weird considering that most politicians say stuff on video nowadays and not really writing articles anymore since the invention of the radio pretty much lol. Hope it’s a better fit here, this is the kind of stuff people should be aware of.
cross-posted from: https://lemmy.zip/post/73859928
cross-posted from: https://lemmygrad.ml/post/13118934
Josh Turek of Iowa, Democrat, comes out with one of the worst anti-trans ads yet.
Not only is it an anti-sports ad, it proposes a ban on federal funding for gender affirming care. That would hit all medicaid and medicare patients, and any ACA federally-subsidized plans as well.


What message are you trying to send, though? The only information they get from your non-vote is that the other guy wins, and he is full-on anti-trans. The message, from their vantage point, is “be more anti-trans because that is what wins.”
They see the actual number of votes. If voter turnout is on average for the republican candidate but lower than average for the democratic candidate, and accounting for any voter suppression, the DNC would be able to see that their messaging didn’t resonate.
And if the anti-trans dem wins the message to all dems in the US will be “you can end a 18 year-long losing streak by throwing trans people under the bus”
The guy in this ad is literally advocating for policy that will result in the deaths of trans people. Trans people who suddenly lose access to their medications and are not able to go elsewhere to get them are not just going to be fine. This is real measurable direct harm right now. This is a part of trans genocide. Those actions are absolutely intended to harm transgender people in an effort to erase us.
Is there a line for you? Where is that line? Do you think that if he wins he will suddenly stop being anti trans? Do you not think that him winning will also signal to all other democratic candidates running that advocating for trans genocide is actually a great idea and will win them elections?
so is the other guy
staying home doesnt make it better
Yes it does, eventually. Y’all have been having the same argument for decades, but if you had voted third party decades ago instead of just lying down and accepting the ‘lesser evil’ then things would be different and wouldn’t have shifted so far right. You all have been playing right into the corpos hands forever by constantly punching left as everythibg shifts right. This cycle will carry on perpetually until enough people stop throwing away the limited power they have, which is the choice to not choose ANY shitty option.
lol we’re barely into Trumps presidency (all the fun stuff happens in part 2) and you still think things are going like normal? lmao
we’ve lost 40 years of progress in 1 because Democrats weren’t pure enough for you
and i say this hating both clintons
They get the message of statistics from the number of people who voted and left the spot blank. Those ballots will also have data on the people that they did vote for.