It probably boils down to costs, because passengers lives are cheap, sensors are not apparently.

Yup, but still, there is one track, two objects moving towards each other. Is there truly no technology that can prevent this situation regardless of human errors?

I really don’t get it. How is it even possible for two trains to collide in 2026, computer error or not? What a tragedy.

Nothing will change while we have the Orange, Putin, right wing in general and such at helm of bigger countries.

True, if we have huge surplus of renewables, then the cost doesn’t matter that much.

As per storage. Nuclear is far less problematic to handle in many aspects. Hydrogen is notoriously hard to store and if we go at scale, there would be massive amounts of hydrogen stored everywhere. A tiny spark away of a huge bomb.

No, it’s different with hydrogen. If you want green hydrogen, you’ll waste at least 50% of energy. Then there are storage and flammability etc. We have everything we need for using hydrogen today, but somehow it is not used besides minor experiments.

No, it does does not. If it did, we’d have it everywhere.

Right, because hydrogen is not working. It’s expensive to produce but most importantly incredibly hard to store and very dangerous if it catches fire.

Can confirm, Slovenia.