You guys may be fine with 4°C and already have nuclear power. Weird country.

Endlessly, and with no results.

That…is remarkable brain acrobatics to paint Fukushima somehow in a good light. Tell that shit to yourself. The lucky thing that happened to them was the wind blowing seaside, and not towards Tokyo, else they’d have to evacuate a 30 million inhabitant metropolis. That’s not an achievement of well controlled technology.

A correction is something different than a burst. What do you think is the future there?

Sounds great. Let’s do that. We’ll need electricity in winter too, though.

Not in France, Great Britain or Germany either. Or Poland or Spain. To my knowledge not in Japan either.

Probably you are talking about some countey with lax regulations. Which is curious , because proponents of nuclear power always say Chernobyl could not have happened in a country with good regulations (so Japan probably is not included in that list either)

I listen to news, some of them dedicated to sustainable energy markets, but I’m not an engineer nor so I pretend to be. That news reported in depths about how many large scale battery power plants want to get permission, being blocked primarily by regulation, not technology.

I don’t think they can not, no. That’d be like asking water to stop flowing downstream.

Shut down that exact business and imprison the head AI model, probably.

SpaceX.AI is working on that problem.

An AI led business is a very important building block of rogue AI finishing off humankind. How else will it secure enough unsupervisable compute?

I hate it how these people take every warning of things that could go wrong as advise for policy.

I hear your argument, it’s old. But I also listen to news, and the storage problem seems to not be a technological problem anymore. Battery storages for the evenings/nights are almost trivial today, it’s a matter of just allowing investors to build.

For winters, the solution could be green methane in existing storages, and for that we’ll also need gas plants. Green methane is sorta inefficient to produce, I get that, but we’re still in a phase where we need much more solar and wind to get across spring and fall. Simultaneously we need to shut the existing production off in summer. Let’s not do that, and produce inefficient methane instead.

But for this transformation we’re constantly held up by the “what about nuclear” argument straight from the fossil lobby playbook. Sorry to say that, but if you are pro sustainability you should be careful whose arguments you repeat. Just like the individual CO2 footprint, there are a number of popular stories propagated by the fossil lobby with the purpose to sow doubt, and therefore stagnation.

From what I know there are many many many such projects in the permit phase in Germany, all of them run on capitalist interest without state funding. The only thing between now and them getting build is our government which seems to prefer a 180° turn into the fossil age.

But it can be stored as Methane in exactly those containers that many countries already have at a large scale for their winters.

That’s an argument from 2017. Today the Technologies are there, and we can build it on scale. Battery for short term, green gas for the longer term.

Great solution. Will you take ours, too? Sincerely, Germany.

It’s highly regulated to evade them just dumping it in your backyard. As for solved… A decade after shutting down the power plants, Germany is still looking for a final storage.

Nuclear is not there when you need it. It’s prohibitively expensive to build, it takes decades to finish. If we wait for nuclear power to replace coal, we’ll be at 4°C.

Better stop complaining about that fantastical technology and use the tools that are there. They’re quite good already, we can do it.

You see, being the good guys that they are,they wanted that going against people with darker skins in other countries.

Doesn’t the story currently go “AI is so powerful it’ll destroy us all, and I want to take an active part in that?”