I agree they have their place. The issue is the governance of that place.
The drones are stated to be connected to the same ALPR network which becomes as troublesome as the the ALPR controversy. The fact that the camera is not static and can be flown around makes it a higher threat to privacy in that regard.
The abuse of such technology could be catastrophic. A warrant wouldn’t be needed to fly over and surveil a neighborhood if they were in pursuit of somebody else. It can absolutely be flown over and around your home without a judge approving it. That’s an issue.
I agree they have their place. The issue is the governance of that place.
The drones are stated to be connected to the same ALPR network which becomes as troublesome as the the ALPR controversy. The fact that the camera is not static and can be flown around makes it a higher threat to privacy in that regard.
The abuse of such technology could be catastrophic. A warrant wouldn’t be needed to fly over and surveil a neighborhood if they were in pursuit of somebody else. It can absolutely be flown over and around your home without a judge approving it. That’s an issue.