• Gladaed@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    19
    ·
    1 day ago

    Not a great look on your part.

    Someone was indoctrinated enough to take up knifes and try to kill police man/Israeli people in an embassy. That’s a tragedy at any rate.

      • Gladaed@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        1 day ago

        Actually perfectly intelligible. A dead assailant doesn’t exist. If you are dead you are no longer a possible assailant.

        • Deadrek@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          22 hours ago

          In English it should read something like, “shoot dead an assailant(still not really ideal) or shot an assailant dead(to death preferably).”

          The mechanics of the title aren’t quite right. While most people will infer the correct meaning, some unnecessary jokes will be made by someone as you can see.

          The way the title reads now it would be interpreted as cops shot the, already dead, corpse of an assailant that died by some other means possibly unrelated to the police.

        • trxxruraxvr@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 day ago

          People are still referred to as criminals or terrorists after they have been killed, why is assailant different?