• anticurrent@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 days ago

    At this stage of AI advancements and industry adoption, I believe most newly released games that have opted to not disclose the use of AI are lying. And steam’s choice of what constitutes AI contributions are misleading, most people don’t know that not having an AI disclosure doesn’t mean no AI use What-so-ever. As the article states AI code doesn’t need to be disclosed, which is the component of the game that has seen the the most migration towards AI.

    I don’t know what role that AI disclosure plays anymore. especially when steam itself doesn’t verify publishers claims. I think it’s there just to please steam fans and maintain that cool kid aura.

    • Dnb@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      Bf6 doesn’t disclose AI usage and its clear its used on the cosmetics including paid skins

      The patches are also janky which makes people think at least some code is also ai generated

      Most editors if not all support AI and include it so its going to be very hard to say noone uses it during development anymore.

      But clearly difference between responsible use and slop.

      Remember editor’s have had Intelisense and other similar functions for decades

      Edit: for the down voters care to comment?

      Do you think bf6 isn’t using any AI?

      Do you think there are no valid use cases for AI?

      • mika_mika@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        21 hours ago

        The people in this thread are being disingenuous enough to compare AI disclosure to ingredient labels on food. You’re not going to get a fair answer to your question.

        Unless you think being poisoned is the same as being subjected to AI artwork, because Steam still allows AI assisted code, so the moral reasons to be anti-AI are out the window.