And Jeffries wants to blame it entirely on affordability. He’s not right either: we need to resist any incumbents trying to pigeonhole it into any single issue.
It is the war. It is affordability. It is corruption. It is violation of human rights. It is the administration acting above the law. It is capricious cancellation of services which saved lives. And it certainly is the appointment of incompetent sycophants to positions that used to be meritorious
Yummmm, is that a list we can put ourselves on? Can we make it nationwide, take all that ice funding, rather than just Michigan?
Save the jail talk for people who acted I Legally. For the corrupt, not just those whose policies we dislike
Controlled flooding gives a place for the water to go when there’s too much. For example I remember reading about dikes along the Mississippi for flood control, but when there was too much water it would flood less inhabited farmland before city areas
When I was a kid, one of the fields at the local park where we used to play football and soccer was lower than the rest and separated by berms. It was designed as a controlled place for water to go when the river flooded every spring with snow melt.
Of course, climate change means we now have a more permanent solution to snow melt
Getting even is different from ensuring criminals meet consequences.
You cant pardon an impeachment, so theres still something.
This administration has already guaranteed its spot in history but a little more corruption will just add to that
There’s always the possibility there are Republicans with ethics and values (and who have not yet quit in disgust), who will find their voice now that they won’t be marginalized by their own party.
many anti-trans Democrats
My search found three. That’s too many of course but definitely not “many” nor enough to tar and feather the party with. It’s three
While any such rhetoric is bad, and it was loud and made headlines, it was only a couple candidates.
This is very much NOT “both sides the same”
We don’t care so much about any “legislative agenda” Trump may have. We care about reining in the corruption, the abuses of authority, illegal executive orders. Will we get a Congress that actually does stuff, will it protect its own constitutional authority, and will it do something about those enriching themselves on their government authority. And that’s before even will government do things for its constituents rather than just its corporate donors.
Winning majorities is only the start
In this deranged administration, they do have to worry about some couch fucker deciding to nuke them because his feelings got hurt
Yes, he should move there. I hear there’s some great land available in Gaza. I’m sure the neighbors will be friendly to such a kind and empathetic president
That’s a good start, but this is a multifaceted threat to democracy. I don’t see how they could expect disenfranchising 20,000 people would affect California elections, BUT
Both of the injunction cases have some legal problems. They purport to restrict the feds from doing certain subpoenas or certain indictments before they actually do them
In normal times, it’s a good idea for someone to be harmed before you try to redress that harm. But this is one of the things that must change in today’s dysfunctional government, where people don’t hesitate to illegally demolish things first in order to say “now you have to let me build a gold plated ballroom for my 900 closest friends”. What good is a justice system that can’t stop injustice?
They block AP News? That’s hardly a scam source
The research found that 8,880 of the names, representing 42% of the entire list, do not correspond to anyone in California’s current voter file.
The one thing missing from articles like this is any look at _where_the names are. Disenfranchising 20,000 voters usually won’t affect a statewide election in California, but it certainly could decide local elections and maybe congressional
Realistically i think it’s just a trial balloon. They’re trying many different ways of interfering with election to see what they can get away with, and in the hope they add up
That’s crazy! Why did it take until its eulogy to finally see what made it unique?
Something, something …. He must not have learned Arabic numbers in school
You’re not meant to.
But it couldn’t be dear leader. Couldn’t be our bombastic buffoon in chief. Couldn’t be mango Mussolini. Oh no, it must have been someone else
And since the Supreme Court decided the President is above the law, we’re stuck with passing the buck to the incompetent sycophants who carried it out