She doesn’t really read like a fan of personal autonomy and opponent of all political force, no.

Maybe? On this side of the Atlantic, toning down their message is the one thing the far-right can’t really do. Even suggesting that, within a party, would just mark you as a traitor.

The demographics of the far-right are pretty different over there, though, and so probably are the dynamics. Although, if you concede one form of nuance, you’re bound to concede more, and at some point you’re just another mainstream party.

To a lot of older people, this isn’t going to be surprising. Shitty and crazy transmutes, more often than goes away.

Ancaps, in AfD? Do you have a source on that one?

Free trade, and everyone minding their own business, is more what the FDP is about. And pretty far away from closed borders and racial purity.

The second one, sure. The first one was a whole different dynamic. You didn’t even know which side you would be on, necessarily, until an archduke got shot, secret alliances came out and it started.

Well, the alternative would be admitting there’s something wrong with the far-right worldview, and attitude, which Trump represents.

Instead, you can just lie about what’s happening in geopolitics, like you lie about the domestic situation. EZ.

Could this be the Russians, as well?

And, at a deeper level, what you get when your political movement (German environmentalists, in this case) opposes everything and recommends nothing.