It means that a passport only matters to the extent that the countries being traveled between care about it.

Warm salty water flows north in the Gulf Stream, and then sinks when it cools in the North Atlantic (because saltier water is denser). Once it sinks, it flows back south along the bottom of the ocean.

Cold fresh water entering the North Atlantic due to ice melt from Greenland disrupts that process. The faster Greenland’s ice cap melts, the slower the current gets.

If it stops entirely, heat stops getting transported by the Gulf Stream and northwestern Europe (especially Britain) starts looking more like Alaska.

Most people will fold and get the account

Well, except for the (apparently) vast swathes of long-time users who get permabanned for bullshit reasons (or no given reason at all) and then can’t make a new account because of “ban evasion.” I guess they just aren’t allowed to experience Reddit at all, even lurking.

I know it isn’t the same cross-sectional area. I was just suggesting the same as how my local government does tree recompense.

They should be forced to replant the same number of trunk diameter-inches. (Or diameter-meters, I guess, being in Finland.) In other words, for every 1’ diameter tree they remove, they should have to plant 12 1" saplings (either back on the same site or elsewhere when they run out of space).

Even blatant greed isn’t enough to explain shit like randomly picking fights with Greenland and fawning over Kim Jong Un.

Calling Trump “senile” downplays the traitorous duplicity.

At this point, he’s done so much shit that “ineptitude” no longer cuts it as a plausible explanation. Occam’s razor says he’s trying to destroy the US on purpose.

(i.e., hoping their voters are too stupid to pick the R candidate)

To be clear, both Dan Sullivans are the R candidates. Who’s to say the votes for J instead of S aren’t on purpose? 😇

What the fuck does that have to do with how the Kims have ruled the country since then?

I understand perfectly well how tech works. I also understand how property rights work – or at least, how they’re supposed to work.

The real question is, why does a person asserting their right not to be abused by corporations apparently offend your sensibilities so much that you have to tell bullshit lies in some desperate, pathetic attempt to smear me?

Just wait, the bad guys don’t win for long.

Tell that to the North Koreans.

In reality, the bad guys don’t lose unless we beat them.

Before unmounting:

$ tree -afx /PATH/TO/VOLUME > file_listing.txt

Later, when you want to search:

$ grep PATTERN file_listing.txt

an incident alleged to have taken place at New York’s Plaza Hotel in 1993

3°C warmer world, 3°C (or more) cooler western Europe once the AMOC collapse kicks in. Kiss agriculture in Britain bye-bye.

“Hanged.” “Hung” is something else.

Every court that disagrees is tyrannical and needs to be fucking abolished.

No, because the law cares about intent, not technical details. Having my property do DNS over HTTPS because that’s what I, the owner, wanted is fine; having my property do DNS over HTTPS because that’s what some non-owner entity wanted against my will as the owner is not.

RFCs are subordinate to laws. If I, the device and network owner, want my device to use the DNS I set and the device does differently, I want the rogue corp prosecuted and IDGAF what some goddamn RFC says!

That ought to be illegal.

(No, seriously: disobeying DNS the owner set by DHCP ought to count as “exceeding authorized access” under the CFAA.)

INB4 !bigtechatemyface@lemmy.world

[Or rather, not INB4 because I just made it.]