The whole point was keeping the temperature sensor readable remotely so that you didn’t have to pay someone to stand around all day.
Absolute worst case, add a second temp sensor for the automated chill cycles. Pretty sure temperature sensors aren’t that expensive.
You walk over to it and make the change?
How often do these freezers need changing of temperature? My guess would be at most a handful of times a year.
Amd if the controls aren’t remotely connected you don’t have to worry about this type of issue.
Put the temp sensor on a separate system from the controls
In one exchange, an employee in the company’s security Slack channel urged Proton to at least take a few days to pentest newly written code before pushing it live. “That’s bullshit and loser thinking. Of course it’s possible to be fast and secure,” Yen wrote in the channel at the end of August. “Stop thinking always of how to be slower, and focus more on how to be faster.” Yen added, “stop lovingly handcrafting all our code and use AI more.”
Yikes, this Yen guy seems really charming
Det är en budget och prioriteringsfråga
Under högt tryck, vid temperaturer strax över nollpunkten, pressas ölet genom ett tunt membran som bara släpper igenom vatten medan alkohol, aromämnen och allt annat innehåll blir kvar.
I feel like you’re not understanding what I am trying to convey. Or I am not being clear enough?
A temperature sensor being hacked is nothing to worry about. Worst case scenario, the hacked sensor will report the wrong temperature and some employee will come running over to the freezer. Upon manual inspection they will realise the temperature is in fact not +50°C despite the exposed sensor reporting that.
The freezers automated freezing/heating just runs off an other separate temperature sensor that won’t be hacked since it is not exposed to the internet.
Don’t this make sense to you? 😅