“People, understandably, are having trouble believing in the polls,” Nate Silver acknowledged to New York Times columnist Ezra Klein.

The post Nate Silver Suggests ‘Momentous’ Midterms Might Mark ‘the End of the Trump Era’ first appeared on Mediaite.

  • Janx@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    9 hours ago

    Don’t listen to polls, don’t let people keep you from voting to improve things, don’t put it off…

    VOTE!!!

    • buddascrayon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      6 hours ago

      Nah, it’ll be alright. Plenty of people are voting and I have things to do. Besides, both parties suck anyhow so nothing’s gonna change.

      Literally what a coworker said to me today.

    • Auli@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      9 hours ago

      What well be funny is when it is a blue wave and nothing changes. They stilll let him do whatever he wants. Is that the tipping point?

  • mrmaplebar@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    59
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    13 hours ago

    Man there is nothing we love more than counting our chickens before they hatch, huh?

  • Professorozone@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 hours ago

    I’d like to point out that in an interview where Nate Silver came out looking like an arrogant ass, he predicted Trump would lose the last election.

  • leadore@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    7 hours ago

    “People, understandably, are having trouble believing in the polls,” Nate Silver acknowledged

    Especially Nate Silver’s interpretation of them.

  • CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    6 hours ago

    If so, I hope the media constantly and always mentions this, if not in the title, above the fold, in all articles related to donnie for the rest of his term.

    • [object Object]@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      27
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      13 hours ago

      He gave Trump 2016 more odds than anyone else, the model probability was 1/3 chance, up to polling issues.

      All Nate Silver’s models did was run a hierarchical Bayesian regression model with polls weighted by demographics and their forecast accuracy on previous elections.

      • butwhyishischinabook@anarchist.nexus
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        25
        ·
        edit-2
        12 hours ago

        Yeah this is just a horrible take. 538 was the only one I remember actively cautioning that a Trump win was possible and a 20% chance means you win one in five times you run the election. People who say they were notoriously wrong, frankly, weren’t paying attention.

        EDIT to correct typo.

  • trainsrkool@lemmy.mlBanned
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    23
    ·
    13 hours ago

    ha oh is the coin flipping on the uniparty! that must mean theyre going to switch to the rainbow colored genocide bombs instead soon. “democracy”

    • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      12 hours ago

      The worst part of right before an election is all the accounts spamming “don’t vote it doesn’t matter” out of nowhere…

    • LetMeShowYouAThing@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      11 hours ago

      This doesn’t work when people can see the difference with their own eyes. Your talking points are out of date. Возвращайся домой — получишь новые указания.

    • kmartburrito@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 hours ago

      Enjoy your “Both sides bot” tag on lemmy. Don’t care if you’re a bot or not, might as well be.