The Straits Times - Get latest breaking news, business, sports, lifestyle, tech & multimedia and more news in Singapore, Asia & rest of the world at straitstimes.com.
Why can’t he? Nobody will stop them. The world should be hoping for a US civil war. Meanwhile, they should build up their defenses (which they are) and even prepare to invade should a civil war happen.
What does it mean? Taco. Trump always chickens out.
They pushed that bullshit phrase before he attacked Venezuela and then Iran.
It is antagonistic, it doesn’t even make sense for someone that hates everything he does to say. Why would anyone want to goad him into doing more damage.
Invading a NATO ally is a whole different ball game than launching an illegal Middle East war. They’re only replaced, at my last count, 10% of the General Staff. That’s not nearly enough for total control and doesn’t count thousands and thousands of lower ranking officers.
The American Military has never had any qualms about murdering their own citizens. What makes you think they’d have any qualms about invading a NATO country?
No he’s not. He isn’t doing shit there. He may claim he does, but he won’t do anything.
Because he can’t.
Why can’t he? Nobody will stop them. The world should be hoping for a US civil war. Meanwhile, they should build up their defenses (which they are) and even prepare to invade should a civil war happen.
Trump
Always
Chickens
Out
That’s a far right slogan that was pushed by his weirdos onto reddit.
It’s very pathetic to see someone using that phrase in the wild.
That’s the first time I see a claim like that, therefore I don’t believe you.
Are you serious? What does it mean, for one? It’s to antagonize him to do something? Call him to chicken to do shit, inciting him to do shit?
It doesn’t even make sense for anyone that doesn’t like him to say.
What?
What does it mean? Taco. Trump always chickens out.
They pushed that bullshit phrase before he attacked Venezuela and then Iran.
It is antagonistic, it doesn’t even make sense for someone that hates everything he does to say. Why would anyone want to goad him into doing more damage.
Unless you’re a right-wing nut case.
What?
Invading a NATO ally is a whole different ball game than launching an illegal Middle East war. They’re only replaced, at my last count, 10% of the General Staff. That’s not nearly enough for total control and doesn’t count thousands and thousands of lower ranking officers.
What makes you think they need total control? When has the American Military ever not gleefully committed crimes?
There may be some internal conflict and discharges all over the place, but I think most of the military would be on board with it.
On board with invading a NATO country?! Think on that some more. It’s not up there with nukes, but we’re well past merely fucked up geopolitics.
The American Military has never had any qualms about murdering their own citizens. What makes you think they’d have any qualms about invading a NATO country?
And when has the American military murdered its own citizens? A handful of National Guard at Kent State? That’s it?
But let’s stipulate that they’re just fine with killing US citizens. Going against NATO’s military is a very different proposition.
Good lord. The unimaginable willful ignorance you just displayed is staggering.
And yet you don’t have a single example to enlighten me? And nothing to say about my second statement?