• mycodesucks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    17 days ago

    I wish I didn’t know developers who would look at this and go “What’s the joke? Sounds like a good idea.”

    • tempest@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      17 days ago

      Guilty.

      95 percent of the people using computers are just using them for a browser.

      Let’s implement the DOM in hardware!

  • scutiger@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    17 days ago

    Ok but how bad does it get when the 256MB emoji cache is full? Cause that’s not enough space for all my emoji.

    • OwOarchist@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      17 days ago

      With catptchas becoming more and more common as sites try to stop AI crawlers, I suspect that’s going to become a real thing…

      A real thing that irrevocably identifies you online, with absolutely no anonymity, and costs $9.95 per month, and only works on Cloudfare captchas.

  • MoffKalast@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    17 days ago

    Needs 2x 10GbE ports to download bloated React apps directly into its onboard cache. Otherwise perfect.

  • Australis13@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    17 days ago

    I love the idea that somebody at NIST is in charge of collating a Standard Minions Meme Collection.

  • UnfortunateShort@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    17 days ago

    I know this is a joke - but there totally is hardware acceleration for some of this stuff in modern processors. There definitely is for JS, JSON and generally string stuff. It’s not even x86 only, ARM got these kinds of things as well (although likely less of it)

    • rumschlumpel@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      17 days ago

      Hardware acceleration for an interpreted programming language? Can you point me to a specific example or clarify what you mean, because I find that hard to believe.

      • Hal@piefed.nz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        17 days ago

        I’m not sure what they were going for, but I know that modern browsers do just in time compilation for regularly repeated code parts to allow much faster execution, so “interpreted programming language” may be a little of a blurry definition. See https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Glossary/Just_In_Time_Compilation

        I couldn’t find any info on any hardware specific to JS/JSON for clients but I’m no expert, maybe they will provide more info.