It also requires the “centrist” to help

I am currently reading Anti-Fascist Economics by Isabella Weber and it talks about how fascist politicians exploit prices of essential goods and badly functioning social systems to push a fascist ideology as a change from the status quo.

The fascists will also work with neo-liberals to ensure these trends continue which make the public more susceptible to their propaganda and the proposed solutions to the issues that they helped create.

Like it or not, the price of eggs and gas actually influenced people to vote for Trump, and that was the plan.

#euroslop

Wouldn’t magnetic tape be the wrong storage medium for generative models?

Or is this some type of non-archival iteration?

Future breaking news: Cisco hardware used in massive botnet attack.

I’m not scared of generative models. I am scared that oligarchs with unlimited resources and increaseing influence will face no consequences for their crimes.

This is nothing to do with health.

This is a subtle reference to how one of his vices is raping children.

I mostly agree with you in threory.

However, I do think the issues I’ve brought up exist even if it is not a corporate model. That is because most people will not be making their own llm.

Just like in theory people could make their own operating system for their computer, the same way that Linus did. Most people will not go that route, they will use the kernel, maybe they might make a distro, but they aren’t willing to make it entirely from scratch.

So when it comes to using genAI, you are going to have a lot of people (including leftists) just using a corporate model, then you have a smaller subset trying out “open” models like deepseek, then a smaller subset locally hosting a distilled model, and a smaller subset fine tuning a model or using RAG, and smaller and smaller subsets of people maybe try to build something on their own.

So in reality, most of these users will be making predictable and easily influenced output using these tools.

Also, I think the basic function of these tools, which will be true for open or corporate models, makes us less dependent on eachother, which I think will lead to even more self centered societies then we currently have and not the community centric goal that I think a lot of us share.

This is good advice normally, but this mod has banned me from more communities that I’ve never interacted with than I have given them downvotes.

I think there is a larger play.

I don’t actually care about the ban. I am warning others.

I honestly enjoy your content and respect you from what I have seen you do so far, but your instance has problems I can’t ignore.

PS, I never called your instance fascist or anti-woke. However due to the work of papaskwat and donaldjmusk I think most of lemmy.today is bad faith astroturfing. And I do avoid it for the most part because of that.

https://lemmy.today/post/58772407

That story is tragic.

Now, why is it that you thought you had banned me from that community? Do you have an alt or sock puppet account with mod privileges there?

Out of curiosity, which fuckcars post did you think i was talking about?

Lol, I didn’t know but that explains some things

Correct, this is my current opinion of you from my many interactions with you.

I was on the tesseract secret censor list, and I get preemptively banned from communities that are against human rights often.

I’ve not yet experienced vote brigading in my comms, I’ve only ever seen censoring and silencing of voices PTBs disagree with.

So I wouldn’t call myself lucky but I guess it could be worse, which is why vigilance is needed.

I’m glad to know that you disagree with fascism.

I do have my reasons for my opinion, but I am open minded and I know people change. However, I’m also cautious.

I’ll be keeping tabs to see if your actions correlate with your statements.

I think you are a fascist for banning me over anti-fascist statements, and for the things you’ve said and posted in other places in the Fediverse among your many alts.