Is it backfiring, though? [Gestures broadly]
This is a bullshit headline and pretty much propaganda against voting regardless of the content.
This is propaganda to get the left to stay home and not vote.
The general thrust of the article is just that voters don’t want to vote for someone backed by the LLM industry. Propaganda like you’re describing exists, but this is not it.
Ok, maybe not propaganda, but misleading.
Three quarters of the likely voters said that they would be less apt to vote for a candidate if they found out they had accepted a donation from an AI Super PAC.
Less apt? Grandpa may hate AI, but that’s not going to stop him from voting for Mike Rogers. These articles create a false sense of victory and that hurts the left.
Less apt? Grandpa may hate AI, but that’s not going to stop him from voting for Mike Rogers. These articles create a false sense of victory and that hurts the left.
Where is your evidence of this?
The fact that a criminal, insurrectionist, rapist won a presidential election. No more evidence needed.
stole* ☝🏼
There’s no concrete evidence that any election was stolen, and until there is you sound just like them.
Sorry, here: I’ve done the legwork for you, fellow poor.
I understand where you’re coming from, thanks.
Not it is not.
Yeah it is.
its the exact opposite of what you think it is. AI is specifically making people to vote against it.
How?
The Billionaire capture of our screens and thoughts has been very successful overall. Stay vigilant.
Elon Musk alone has pumped more than $445 million into Republican campaigns ahead of the midterms, after spending a near-equal sum to get president Donald Trump elected in the last election cycle. Leading The Future, a Super PAC backed by OpenAI and Palantir cofounders and prominent tech venture capitalists including Marc Andreessen, has amassed $140 million to dole out to pro-AI candidates.
From wikipedia about Leading the Future:
In May 2026, the Campaign Legal Center filed a complaint with the Federal Election Commission alleging that super PACs associated with Leading the Future evaded federal transparency requirements by funneling payments through shell companies.[22] Contributions to Leading the Future in 2026 include $50,000,000 from Ben Horowitz and Marc Andreessen and $25,000,000 from Greg and Anna Brockman.[23]
